| Subscribe via RSS

…Santa Is Getting Thinner Every Year

December 24th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Culture

Santa1. Throughout history, a variety of Christian churches have opposed the idea of Santa Claus and Christmas as the holiday has become increasingly secular in focus. Christmas was actually banned under Oliver Cromwell’s government following the English civil war. And in 1958, Reverend Paul Nedergaard, a Danish clergyman, declared Santa Claus to be a pagan goblin after his image was used on fund-raising material for a Danish welfare organizaiton.

2. Some corners believe that Santa Claus is the ultimate symbol of the commercialization of a religious holiday. Carol Jean-Swanson notes that Santa, “has become burdened with some of society’s greatest challenges: materialism, corporate greed, and domination by the media.” While this is certainly true, Jean-Swanson offers that the spirit of Santa Claus also encompasses some of our highest ideals: childhood purity and innocence, selfless giving, unfaltering love, justice, and mercy.

3. Some parenting “experts” believe that Santa Claus is an ill considered deception to children, who will inevitably become disappointed and disillusioned when they find out the truth. They also argue that it is unethical for parents to lie to children without good cause, and that it discourages healthy skepticism in children. Bah, humbug!

4. There always seems to be someone out there with bad intentions, even if it means destroying a child’s fantasy and imagination. Santa Claus is no exception. Canada Post’s annual Santa letter campaign, in which every child that writes to Santa gets one in return, was recently shut down as some letters to children contained filthy and sexually explicit messages.

5. It looks like Santa’s jolly old tag line of “Ho Ho Ho” is under attack. In Australia, there have been attempts to have Santas say “Ha Ha Ha” instead of “Ho Ho Ho” as some argue that the latter may frighten children and could be derogatory to women.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google]

Related Posts

  • ….Why Santa Claus has a Terrible Job
  • ….You Shouldn’t Have Children
  • …We Shouldn’t Underestimate the Importance of Halloween
  • ….Why Santa Claus has a Terrible Job

    December 21st, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Other Stuff

    Santa Claus
    1. He lives in the North Pole all year with an old woman and a bunch of dirty, Rudolph-hating reindeer. I mean, how would you like to live in the middle of nowhere with the closest Starbucks located several thousand miles away? And it’s not like the weather is ever balmy in the North Pole, although global warming could quickly change that.

    2. Santa gets pounded with millions of letters from children who are demanding stuff they probably don’t deserve. Look, for example, at this one: “Dear Santa, I’ve been amazingly good this year so if you could bring me a pair of black Easton hockey pants (medium) and a new hockey bag (preferably one with wheels), that would be totally awesome”. Hold on, that’s my letter to Santa! What’s going on here? Is Santa leaking gifts lists to the blogosphere or what?

    3. Every year, Santa has to do the over-night shift as he flies around the world delivering gifts. Then, it’s up and down, up and down chimneys all night. And then there’s all thelukewarm milk and store-bought cookies that children leave him as a snack. Come on! How about a nice croissant and a cafe au lait or a shot of 20-year-old scotch. Now, that would give Santa a little get up and go on busy night.

    4. Santa is clearly under a lot of stress. He’s over-worked, over-weight and probably suffering from a bad case of sunlight deprivation what with living up North and all. Santa needs some vitamin D and a little R&R. Maybe a week shooting craps in Vegas or at a swanky Club Med in the Caribbean. Now, that would put Santa back on the right track.

    More: Workers’ Comp Insider agrees that Santa’s job is a nightmare, adding that: “He’s overweight, he drives too fast, and there is some evidence that he is tipping brandy while he drives. Plus he smokes a pipe and eats too many cookies.”

    Update: Seth Godin has some thoughts on what Santa looks like (and it’s not because of Coca-Cola’s efforts!)

    Technorati Tags:

    [Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google]

    Related Posts

  • …Santa Is Getting Thinner Every Year
  • ….We Shouldn’t Exchange Xmas Gifts
  • ….Gift Cards Are a Bad Deal
  • …A-Rod Is A Grinch

    December 20th, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Sports

    Grinch1. Despite earnings of nearly US$200 million over the past decade, tax records show that A-Rod has donated an average of $30,000 per year to his AROD Family Foundation over the past eight years. In 2002, he contributed only $5,500! While he has made contribution to a myriad of other charities, including Boys & Girls Clubs of America, his Foundation should be at the masthead of his generosity.

     2. The Foundation, in which A-Rod surely has an active participation, distributed to the community an average of only $13,000 per year between 1998 and 2006. In 2006, the Foundation gave away $5,090 despite collecting $368,000 at a fundraiser.

    3. A-Rod has amassed an empire of apartment complexes, but has done little to improve the standard of living at them. In fact, he has upped the late fees to $100, from $50, on units that generally rent for about $600 per month. Granted, it may not actually be him hiking the fees, but he is ultimately accountable for their management as CEO of Newport Property Ventures.

    4.  In exchange for A-Rod’s 500th homerun ball, the fan that caught the ball was offered little from the Yankees. Jason Zillo, the team’s media relations directors and A-Rod appointed negotiator, offered Walter Kowalczyk a bunch of autographed memorabilia, noting, “We have a lot of future Hall of Famers.” With his salary, A-Rod could have done a little better than that and Nonsportsmakelike Conduct agrees.

    5. After getting busted for “spending time” with a woman that wasn’t his wife, he made up for it by buying her a $6,000 necklace. For the average Joe with an average salary, the equivalent would of a stick of gum. Kobe broke out a $4 million bauble. (Then again, A-Rod’s wife didn’t have to go through a rape trial.)

    For more on A-Rod’s financial empire, click here.

    [Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google]

    Related Posts

  • …Pogo.com Deserves a Lot More Love
  • ….CEO Compensation is Obscene
  • …Microblogging Is Dumbing Us Down
  • ….Christmas/Holiday Cards Makes No Sense

    December 19th, 2007 | 2 Comments | Posted in Other Stuff

    Xmas Cards
    1. They’re so much work for so little return. You buy them, write a nice note, put the address on the envelope, buy stamps, and, finally, mail them. Upon getting the card, the recipient gives it a quick read and then “stores” in a shelf or throws it in the recycling bin.

    2. They’re made of paper, and have a limited shelf life. It’s not like anyone keeps cards to look fondly upon them months later. Think of all the trees that could be saved if you didn’t send a card.

    3. Christmas and holiday cards are expensive. What are they, a $1 or $2 a shot or something like that (not including postage), which doesn’t seem like a lot of money at a time when you’re spending money like it’s going out of style.

    4. Christmas cards so analog within a digital world. Sure, they’re traditional and it’s nice to get something in the mail from family or friends but after 164 years, it’s time for something new and different.

    5. Christmas cards aren’t really politically correct given we’re increasingly living in multi-faith and multi-ethnic communities where many people don’t celebrate Christmas (although I’m sure everyone enjoys the time off work!)

    Romancing the Blog is also wondering if Christmas cards are a dying traditional, while Unclutterer suggests you can recycle Christmas cards by using some creativity.

    [Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google]

    Related Posts

  • ….Charity Fatigue is Growing
  • ….You Need to Get on Facebook
  • ….We Shouldn’t Exchange Xmas Gifts
  • …Technology Is Killing The Art Of Photography

    December 18th, 2007 | 12 Comments | Posted in Technology

    Going digital1. While advances in technology have allowed digital cameras to come down in price, the quality has yet to come close to 35 millimetre cameras for the average snapper. But that hasn’t stopped anyone from getting their hands on a camera and, in fact, has made it worse. It seems that every consumer electronics company is finding it affordable to include a digital camera in its devices. It’s no longer a perk, but table stakes in meeting consumer expectations.

    2. Cameras are everywhere now. It seems like everywhere you turn, someone’s got a camera in your face. And all of these cameras are producing too many pictures. (Just look at the number of photos on Flickr!) The results are generally crappy, with pictures that are too grainy, out of focus or over/under exposed.

    3. The blame isn’t restricted to just hardware. The access to, and ease of use of, image altering software has allowed for a quick fix to otherwise bad photos. While some may argue that this is part of the creative process, there are very few artists that use Photoshop as part of the medium.

    4. Photographs have become cheap and expendable commodities, so the value associated with pictures is essentially zero. As few pictures are ever printed out and the cost of storage being negligible, snappers don’t really care how they come out. This definitely breeds an attitude of quantity over quality.

    5. With the ubiquity of digital cameras, everyone thinks that they can take good pictures. The truth is, very few people know how to take a proper picture. As eloquently put by Smittymike19 here, “i guess what i am trying to say is taht digital photography is to photography what pornography is to sex. there is no way taht your sex life is as good as a portrayed in pornography. same can be said about digital photography.”

    For more, Alistair Dunning and Mike Pringle at AHDS debate the value of digital cameras.

    [Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google]

    Related Posts

  • ….Starbucks is Losing its Mojo
  • …Advertising Is Pandemic
  • …Privacy Is Doomed

    • Enter your email address:

      Delivered by FeedBurner