<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;Facebook Is So 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-is-so-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-is-so-2007/</link>
	<description>A Blog Focused on Lists</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr. List</title>
		<link>http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-is-so-2007/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-is-so-2007/#comment-819</guid>
		<description>It may be about social networks in general, but I think it's more a case of moving on to the next hot thing. I'm sure a year from now we will be saying similar things about Twitter and its clones (which are arguably social networks as well). There's definitely scope for FB to grow and mature, but it's now just another internet venture looking for ways to monetize its popularity. Maybe 2007 was about the hype and 2008 will be about the reality. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be about social networks in general, but I think it&#8217;s more a case of moving on to the next hot thing. I&#8217;m sure a year from now we will be saying similar things about Twitter and its clones (which are arguably social networks as well). There&#8217;s definitely scope for FB to grow and mature, but it&#8217;s now just another internet venture looking for ways to monetize its popularity. Maybe 2007 was about the hype and 2008 will be about the reality. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasan</title>
		<link>http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-is-so-2007/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-is-so-2007/#comment-817</guid>
		<description>are you sure this is not about SN's in general? - I think the hawks are swooping way to early - maybe they got over buzzed right out of the gate but I see fb as an adolescent, lots of life ahead and lots to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you sure this is not about SN&#8217;s in general? - I think the hawks are swooping way to early - maybe they got over buzzed right out of the gate but I see fb as an adolescent, lots of life ahead and lots to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-is-so-2007/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fourreasonswhy.com/2008/02/22/facebook-is-so-2007/#comment-816</guid>
		<description>...and? 

Who cares if Facebook is "over". Maybe apart from actual Facebook stockholders, potential Webmasters trying create their own social networking site (more or less impossible now with all the other ones around) and attention seeking cam whores who need another place to spread their face over the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and? </p>
<p>Who cares if Facebook is &#8220;over&#8221;. Maybe apart from actual Facebook stockholders, potential Webmasters trying create their own social networking site (more or less impossible now with all the other ones around) and attention seeking cam whores who need another place to spread their face over the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
