…The U.S. Will Not Force Musharraf’s Hand
1. Despite a history of corrupt government and leadership that has been dominated by military dictators, Pakistan remains one of Washington’s principal political and military assets in South Asia. Historically, the country was seen as an essential obstacle to Soviet expansion. More recently, as it sits in the middle of Afghanistan, China and India, the geographical importance for U.S. foreign policy and regional stability cannot be underestimated. A minor tilt in the balance of power can quickly create uncertainty in a region over which the U.S. has tenuous influence.
2. Pakistan is a nuclear time-bomb. Ironically enough, it developed nuclear capabilities with the support of the U.S. Treasury. The U.S. has provided billions of dollars in economic and military aid since the mid-1950s, helping create one of the world’s largest armies. In exchange, the country’s governments have consistently supported U.S. foreign policy positions.
3. While Pakistan appears to be losing the battle in quelling Taliban interests within the country, and despite a dubious and unsuccessful “crackdown” on Islamist extremists, the country remains a key strategic outpost for the U.S.’s war on terror.
4. Oil and natural gas. Pakistan has an abundance of both. With natural resource prices surging and the expansion of both Chinese and Russian influence of global oil stocks, the U.S. is loathe to alienate a significant producer of essential resources. While environmentalism is the buzz word of the day, and Bush has expressed a desire to move off of foreign oil supplies, U.S. consumers are still gluttons for oil.
5. Relations between India and Pakistan are somewhat held together by U.S. interests in the region. While some commentators suggest that U.S. support of Pakistan’s ruling party has driven a wedge between India and Pakistan, any change in policy from the White House (or Pentagon) could provide either side with the gumption to extend its reach into Kashmir.
Related Posts
1. We are greedy, greedy energy users. Unless consumption patterns change dramatically, energy production and use will contribute to global warming through large-scale greenhouse gas emissions. According to an MIT study, rebuilding nuclear power plants could be one of the principle means of reducing carbon emissions. Unfortunately, alternative energy, while promising, is too early in its development for broad commercialization.

